Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 6:48 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
wanted sex offender doing the board

A TAXI operator was ordered to pay more than £2,000 in court costs after challenging a decision to allow a known sex offender to work at his company and then withdrawing the appeal.

Mohammed Sajid Khaliq holds the private hire operator’s licence for Crown and Greenline taxis, in Pendle and had been employing a known sex offender to work as a dispatcher.

The man Mr Khaliq was employing was on the sex offenders register and Pendle Council successfully applied for an order at Burnley Magistrates’ Court to prevent the man entering Mr Khaliq’s taxi company.

Mr Khaliq challenged the decision but on May 25 at Burnley Crown Court, after taking advice, he decided to drop the appeal.

Neil Watson, taxi licensing manager at Pendle Council, said: “Public safety is a top priority for us. At Burnley Crown Court the judge was surprised that Mohammed Khaliq was appealing against our decision and Burnley Magistrates Court which upheld it.

“He called into question whether Mohammed Khaliq was a fit and proper person to operate the business.


is employing a known sex offender to handle calls a public safety issue ?

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
is employing a known sex offender to handle calls a public safety issue ?

Post Rochdale it is.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2017 3:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
is employing a known sex offender to handle calls a public safety issue ?

Post Rochdale it is.

The trade is full of people like this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
is employing a known sex offender to handle calls a public safety issue ?

Post Rochdale it is.


It always has been these pervs have access to customers personal details ffs

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2017 9:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
trotskys twin wrote:
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
is employing a known sex offender to handle calls a public safety issue ?

Post Rochdale it is.


It always has been these pervs have access to customers personal details ffs

Agree with you there TT.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 436 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group