TDO wrote:
Yes, I think some LAs still allow an extra passenger if they are under a certain age, but this varies. And I think some don't count 'babes in arms' at all.
Seems to be a slight conflict here with the seatbelt rules as well.
But how can this be...?
The law states that any passenger 14 and under is the direct responsibility of the driver IE: belt up!
Here's a snippit of section 75 of the Highway code.
75: You MUST wear a seat belt if one is available, unless you are exempt. Those exempt from the requirement include the holders of medical exemption certificates and people making local deliveries in a vehicle designed for the purpose.
Laws RTA 1988 sects 14 & 15, MV(WSB)R & MV(WSBCFS)R
A child still counts as a passenger under the eyes of the law whatever the age is. If a car is designed to carry 4 passengers then that is exactly what it means and if you are licenced by the local council to carry 4 passengers then that also means the same, 4 should mean 4 not 4 plus one child on lap etc. In just the same way that a car is designed to carry 4 passengers the local council couldn't then say "Licenced to carry 5 passengers".
Regardless of what the LA might say 4 means 4, it's also a good get-out clause as mentioned here before for the insurance company, 4 pairs of passenger legs not 5. Can you imagine a claim put against a driver because of an accident where the insurance company won't pay out, I'm sure there isn't one taxi driver here, Hackney or PH that could afford to pay such large sums of money.