Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 9:15 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
A couple of years now since we've heard much about the megazones (one year of that gap is for obvious reasons), but there's a bit of that in here.

But bit of a motley crew as regards the local authorities involved in this - can't see anything obvious linking Greater Manchester, Birmingham, Portsmouth and Sheffield local authorities, although they're all cities or conurbations rather than towns or rural areas, and have been designated CAZs (of course, the Manchester call is from a combined authority encompassing ten separate licensing councils).


Local authorities call on government for help to support taxi and private hire trade

https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk ... ire-trade/

• Greater Manchester, Birmingham, Portsmouth and Sheffield call on government for urgent meeting to discuss concerns from the taxi and private hire trade that the impacts of the pandemic – combined with current government policy – may threaten livelihoods and the sector as a whole.

• Renewed calls to close legal loophole that allows private hire vehicle drivers and vehicle owners to dodge local regulations.

• Concerns about the future of availability of wheelchair accessible hackney cabs without adequate funding support.

Four of England’s major local authorities and city-regions have united to ask government for an urgent meeting, following concerns from the taxi and private hire trade that the impacts of the pandemic combined with current government policy may threaten livelihoods and the sector as a whole.

A letter to the Secretary of State for Transport, copied to the government’s Joint Air Quality Unit, calls for an immediate review of government policies – and adequate funding to ensure there is enough support for the trade.

Concerns are raised that current policy may significantly reduce convenient and wheelchair accessible hackney carriage provision, in a sector that forms a key part of the transport network and lifeline for many, including people with mobility issues.

Local authorities and city-regions in Greater Manchester, Birmingham, Portsmouth and Sheffield have all been directed by government to introduce Clean Air Zones (CAZ) to tackle nitrogen dioxide levels on local roads – affecting taxis and private hire vehicles that don’t meet emissions standards.

The local authorities all support the case for better air quality and are driving forward region-specific plans. They are also urging government to ensure funding levels support drivers and operators to move to the more expensive lower-emission vehicles required for hackney cab services in Clean Air Zone areas.

There is also a renewed call to close the legal loophole that jeopardises passenger safety by allowing private hire vehicle drivers and vehicle owners to dodge more stringent local driver and vehicle regulations by being licensed anywhere in the country.

Greater Manchester recently carried out two major consultations on proposals for a Clean Air Zone, and Minimum Licensing Standards for taxis and private hire, and the responses are currently being analysed by an independent organisation.

A Greater Manchester-wide Clean Air Zone – the largest in the UK outside London – is expected to be introduced in spring 2022 to tackle air pollution on local roads.

Andy Burnham, Greater Manchester Mayor, said: “The pandemic has hit the taxi and private hire trades hard and they have told us that COVID-19 – alongside government policies – poses a very real threat to the future of the industry. And when you factor in the potential costs of upgrading to Clean Air Zone vehicle standards, and the competition from out-of-town private hire services, there’s an even bigger impact on thousands of drivers who have families to support in what has been an incredibly tough year.

“Of course we are absolutely committed to improving air quality, reducing carbon emissions and improving standards for our locally licensed fleets. We’re taking action locally, but we need the government to come to the table and discuss ways it can properly support the sector. We need the right regulatory tools and funding to support the trade to move to cleaner, more accessible vehicles, and protect customers by making sure local private hire is regulated locally.”

Cllr Waseem Zaffar, Cabinet Member for Transport and Environment at Birmingham City Council, said: “Birmingham's hackney carriage and private hire community provide an invaluable service to the people who live, work and visit our city.

“We have already put schemes in place to help this community prepare for the Clean Air Zone and that recognises the financial challenges brought about by the pandemic. But this is not just a challenge that local authorities must shoulder, which is why we are adding our voice to this call for national action.”

Cllr Gerald Vernon-Jackson, Leader of Portsmouth City Council, said: “Many industries have been impacted by the pandemic but for the taxi industry, inadequate national government policies are threatening their livelihoods. Not to mention the inadequate funding that is being provided to help them make their vehicles less polluting so they are not charged to travel in the government-imposed Clean Air Zone that we must launch before the end of the year.

“The pressure on the taxi industry is relentless and I, along with other local authorities want the opportunity to discuss this with government during one of the toughest years we have experienced.”

Cllr Robert Johnson, Leader of Sheffield City Council, said: “We’re asking the Secretary of State to understand the pressures taxi and private hire fleets are under and show fairness after a difficult 12 months. Closing the loophole that allows for private hire drivers to work out of their licensed authority would be a major step towards a level playing field, along with additional support to help drivers move to cleaner, more efficient vehicles.

“We know that drivers are facing an important choice with their next taxi: stick with a cheaper-to-buy but polluting fossil fuel, or invest in an electric. Despite being cheaper to run and emitting less carbon, there’s only a small number of electric Hackney vehicles on the market and they’re expensive to buy. It’s important that JAQU understand these issues, but also recognises this is an opportunity to move to a cleaner fleet if the right policy is implemented and the right support is available. We want cleaner air, and the way forward is through investment, and we don’t want to leave drivers in a position where they pay to pollute.

“Sheffield is proud of having a 100% accessible fleet of hackney carriages. They’re key to ensuring children with special educational needs have transport to school. Because of the closed cab design, they’re much more Covid-secure than a regular car and they’ve been used to get vulnerable patients to hospitals and to vaccinations, when other transport wouldn’t be suitable.”

In many urban areas, hackney vehicles have been licensed to a higher standard than private hire, typically requiring them to operate wheelchair accessible, ‘London-style’ black cabs. Up until now this has given drivers and owners a predictable business model, and the general public access to a versatile and accessible fleet.

Under government Clean Air Zone vehicle guidance, hackney drives face a big capital outlay to upgrade vehicles, while the private hire trade will also be directly competing for a similar customer market.

However, it’s currently effectively impossible for local authorities to require wheelchair accessible vehicles across the local private hire fleet. Anyone who chooses not to, can simply seek a driver and vehicle licence anywhere in the country and continue to serve the local market using a standard saloon car.

The hackney trade has been seeing reduced customer demand for some time, with competition from new app-based private hire business models. Both the taxi and private hire sectors report being hugely impacted by the economic consequences of COVID-19.

Local authorities have asked for a meeting with the Secretary of State and government officials at the earliest opportunity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
Not sure if this has been mentioned before, but the proposed Manc megazone has a dedicated website. There's a short animated video here which summarises the issues:

https://www.gmtaxistandards.com/

Slightly more interesting for us maybe is this page below, which summarises the proposed standards, and there's links to the consultation documents etc if anyone wants to dig deeper.

Of course, all this kind of stuff has to be seen in the context of the DfT guidance etc, but interesting that for the Manc megazone the proposal is for black-only HCs, and white-only PHVs.

Also proposed is 5-years-on, 10-years-off, and that's same for both HCs and PHVs by the looks of it.

And livery with a "common Greater Manchester design with council logo incorporated". So effectively two local authority logos in one :roll:

https://www.gmtaxistandards.com/minimum ... standards/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2021 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
• Renewed calls to close legal loophole that allows private hire vehicle drivers and vehicle owners to dodge local regulations.

What exactly is a f***ing legal loophole?

Is that an interesting way of describing what is currently the law?

And despite my views on cross border hiring, which are a tad unsavory, the legal loophole they mention has been law for 45 years now. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2021 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
• Concerns about the future of availability of wheelchair accessible hackney cabs without adequate funding support.

Now that is a genuine concern, as the amount of drivers that can afford £40-60,000 on a new motor is about zero.

And even when things, hopefully, get a bit better, the chances aren't going to be much better for years.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
Sussex wrote:
What exactly is a legal loophole?

Is that an interesting way of describing what is currently the law?

And despite my views on cross border hiring, which are a tad unsavory, the legal loophole they mention has been law for 45 years now. ](*,)

I suppose that whether you regard some legal provision as a loophole depends on whether you agree with it or not :-o

Presumably the licensing chair in Wolverhampton and Uber don't regard it as a loophole, while other licensing 'chiefs' and others in the trade clearly do.

Of course, if you were to look at the thing more objectively, maybe looking at the intention of the law would be instructive.

I mean, did the Law Commission intend to have the likes of the Wolverhamption scenario, or Sefton-plated cars working in Brighton? Or did they just intend ironing out some hard edges with cross-border issues in the likes of the big conurbations?

I don't know, but if it's the former then it's all good, and not a loophole. If they didn't intend the likes of the Wolverhampton scenario then it's maybe fairer to say it's a loophole.

But, in the final analysis, one person's 'loophole' could be regarded as good law by others [-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I would say that there is possibly an element of protectionism in all this because drivers are being tempted to license elsewhere not with them ?

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 539 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group