Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 5:40 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
On the facts as presented, I'd have suspended him for one month max [-(


Taxi driver loses licence after racist remarks to female passenger

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/black- ... r-19938755

Councillors find driver's behaviour showed he wasn’t ‘a fit and proper person’ to hold a taxi licence.

A taxi driver who made racist and intimidating remarks to a passenger before threatening to throw her out of his car has lost his licence.

The unnamed man’s disqualification came after Sandwell’s licensing committee said his behaviour showed he wasn’t ‘a fit and proper person’ to hold a dual private hire and Hackney Carriage permit.

Minutes of its November meeting show the passenger had alleged the driver had been intimidating and made racial comments during a pre-booked journey.

She also claimed at one point he said he threatened to drop her off in an area she didn’t know.

Refusing to continue, he returned the woman to her home address despite being advised by his taxi base to continue to his destination.

Appearing at the review meeting the driver, who was referred to as Mr ‘ P’, admitted he’d made racist comments but said they were about passengers in general and were not aimed at the woman.

He explained he’d been waiting for the passenger for five minutes who he claimed displayed inappropriate behaviour, including unsuitable language and encouraged him to break the speed limit during the journey.

Revoking his permit, councillors said they saw no reasons to ignore established guidelines and said he was not a fit and proper person to hold a licence in Sandwell.

They added, as a professional driver for over 10 years, he had: “Displayed discriminatory behaviour towards a passenger and his interview with a Taxi Licensing Enforcement officer corresponded with the passenger’s witness statement.”

Mr ‘P’ was advised of his right to appeal to a magistrates court.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
On the facts as presented, I've have suspended him for one month max [-(

We don't know the words that were used, but it doesn't surprise me a bit that he had his license revoked.

If he had used certain words there is a chance he could have been jailed.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I have to admit this might have been one situation in which CCTV with voice recording might have provided mitigating evidence

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
I have to admit this might have been one situation in which CCTV with voice recording might have provided mitigating evidence

Or aggravating evidence. :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
Sussex wrote:
We don't know the words that were used, but it doesn't surprise me a bit that he had his license revoked.

Indeed, and it all depends on *what* words were used, and *how* they were said.

I mean, case in point this weekend. Scottish PR guru posted this:

Gordon Beattie wrote:
“At Beattie Communications, we don’t hire blacks, gays or Catholics.

“We sign talented people and we don’t care about the colour of their skin, sexual orientation or ­religion. That’s the way it should be with every company – only hire people for their talent, experience, knowledge and wisdom.”

Now he's been accused of allsorts, and forced to apologise.

As far as I can see all he was doing was to highlight the non-discriminatory nature of his firm's recruitment.

But the offence-mongers think otherwise:


PR tycoon Gordon Beattie apologises for ‘racist’ post

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/pr-t ... -cct0rzq8w

One of Scotland’s most successful public relations experts has caused outrage after saying that his firm did not recruit “blacks, gays or Catholics” as part of a post boasting about its diversity credentials.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 591 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group