Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 5:06 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
JD wrote:
grandad wrote:
8. 'Big bus' operators - ie those operating PSV vehicles with more than 8 passenger seats -can also run small vehicles (with 8 or fewer passenger seats) licensed as PSVs for some private hire work, provided the operation of such vehicles represents a 'small part' of their overall business. This would allow, for example, a big bus operator to use a few saloon cars or people carriers for private hire work, in response to passenger demand. In these circumstances, no PHV licence is required.

I take it that this is the part of the regulations that you are refering to.


Is it not self explanatory?

If its confusing then I'll make it simpler but it looked perfectly fool proof to me.

Regards

JD


I was just quoting the bit that looked relevent so that others did not have to readthe whole lot. :wink:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
I think most of the abuse of the limo and hummer folks, of PSV regs, usually comes via the restricted PSV license. :sad:

There they can use any vehicle as long as it has an orange/brown disc in the window.

As course the wording of the PSV act allowed the Brighton tuk tuks to run a 100% fleet of small PSV licensed vehicles on a national PSV license. [-(


Which section of the 1981 act are they licensed under?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
Which section of the 1981 act are they licensed under?

From memory they are licensed in exactly the same way as big buses i.e. with blue badges. :sad:

The wording of the act says something (without looking) like the PSV must be a motorised vehicle, similar I guess to the wording of a PH.

As he had a national PSV ops license, the Traffic Commisioner was powerless to refuse to license them. :sad:

I'm led to believe it was a significant factor in his subsequent resignation. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:39 am
Posts: 400
Location: Manchester Airport
JD wrote:
Tulsablue wrote:
In answer to your question about licensing, we hold a Standard International licence and therefore operate our 8 seaters under the "big bus" exemption.


As a matter of interest T, how many big buses and 8 seaters do you operate?

Regards

JD


18 big and 2 small = 20

the 10% is only a guideline and has never been set out as to what it exactly means. e.g. 10% of fleet or turnover or profit or number of passengers carried. If you a licence for two vehicles one can be an 8 seater.

_________________
you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
JD wrote:
Which section of the 1981 act are they licensed under?

From memory they are licensed in exactly the same way as big buses i.e. with blue badges. :sad:

The wording of the act says something (without looking) like the PSV must be a motorised vehicle, similar I guess to the wording of a PH.

As he had a national PSV ops license, the Traffic Commisioner was powerless to refuse to license them. :sad:

I'm led to believe it was a significant factor in his subsequent resignation. :sad:


For small buses, which his tuc tucs will be licensed as, he is only allowed 10% of his big bus operation like everyone else.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
TUC-TUC LIMITED
Director(s): DOMINIC PONNIAH.
PK1047478 SN
42 CAMBRIDGE ST LONDON SW1V 4QH

New operating centre: X LEISURE (BRIGHTON II) LTD, OCTAGON OFFICES,
WATERFRONT, BRIGHTON MARINA, BRIGHTON BN2 5WB ()

New authorisation at this operating centre will be: "30" vehicle(s),
______________________

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
New authorisation at this operating centre will be: "30" vehicle(s),

At most he only ever had 12 of the things.

But the funny thing was that when he was fined, he was fined by the number of vehicles he was allowed to run, not per vehicle he actually had. :D :D

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Here's another 15 vehicle license for Edinburgh.

GALLUS EVENTS LTD T/A EVENT TUCTUC

Director(s): HAZEL MACKENZIE, COLIN MACKENZIE. PM1069675 SN

WENT BANK HOUSE, NR MACMERRY , TRANENT EH33 2AH

Operating Centre: THE PLEASANCE THEATRE, 60 PLEASANCE CENTRE ,
EDINBURGH EH8 9TJ

Authorisation:15 Vehicle(s) and 0 Trailer(s).

Transport Manager(s): DOMINIC PONNIAH

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:39 am
Posts: 400
Location: Manchester Airport
Sussex wrote:
Tulsablue wrote:
Unlike a taxi, the price is agreed and usually paid for in advance, it would then be at the discretion of the operator or driver what would happen if 8 turned up instead of six but this I would hope :roll: would be dealt with under company policy.

Well to me that makes it a PH as the car is being booked as a whole, not as seperate parts.

That was the whole point of the 2000 Transport Act amendment.


If you wanted to treat your wife to something special for birthday etc and booked a limo, would the two of you hand over money each or would you pay for it in one go.

If you took the wife and two kids to the zoo on the bus would each one of you pay individually or would you pay for two adults and two kids in one go. Number of tickets does not matter, on a Sunday or Bank hol some companies allow season ticket holders to take 2 adults and two kids for no extra cost.

_________________
you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:39 am
Posts: 400
Location: Manchester Airport
Sussex wrote:
JD wrote:
New authorisation at this operating centre will be: "30" vehicle(s),

At most he only ever had 12 of the things.

But the funny thing was that when he was fined, he was fined by the number of vehicles he was allowed to run, not per vehicle he actually had. :D :D


If he had failed to operate the registered timetable, he would "fined" an amount multiplied by the total number of discs authorised.
Unlike goods vehicles the discs are not vehicle specific, you could have 40 vehicles and only 30 discs but you would only be allowed to operate 30 out on the road at any one time.

_________________
you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
JD wrote:
Here's another 15 vehicle license for Edinburgh.

GALLUS EVENTS LTD T/A EVENT TUCTUC

Director(s): HAZEL MACKENZIE, COLIN MACKENZIE. PM1069675 SN

WENT BANK HOUSE, NR MACMERRY , TRANENT EH33 2AH

Operating Centre: THE PLEASANCE THEATRE, 60 PLEASANCE CENTRE ,
EDINBURGH EH8 9TJ

Authorisation:15 Vehicle(s) and 0 Trailer(s).

Transport Manager(s): DOMINIC PONNIAH


The application must be for a standard license but if the vehicles only seat six passengers then I'm assuming that can't be right, I also assume the same applies to a restricted license?
______________________

Section 14 Grant of licences.

(1) An application for a standard licence shall not be granted unless the traffic [commissioner] [is] satisfied that the applicant meets the following requirements, namely—

(a) the requirement to be of good repute;

(b) the requirement to be of appropriate financial standing; and

(c) the requirement as to professional competence;

and an application for a restricted licence shall not be granted unless the traffic [commissioner] [is] satisfied that the applicant meets the requirements to be of good repute and of appropriate financial standing.

(2) The provisions of Schedule 3 to this Act shall have effect for supplementing the provisions of subsection (1) above, and for modifying the operation of that subsection in the case of persons engaged in road passenger transport before 1st January 1978.

(3) Notwithstanding that it appears to the traffic [commissioner] on an application for a standard or restricted licence that the requirements mentioned in subsection (1) above are met, the application shall not be granted unless the [commissioner] [is] further satisfied—

(a) that there will be adequate facilities or arrangements for maintaining in a fit and serviceable condition the vehicles proposed to be used under the licence; and

(b) that there will be adequate arrangements for securing compliance with the requirement of the law relating to the driving and operation of those vehicles.

[(3A) In considering on an application for a PSV operator's licence whether the requirements mentioned in subsection (3) above are satisfied, the traffic commissioner may take into account any undertakings given by the applicant (or procured by him to be given) for the purposes of the application and may assume that those undertakings will be fulfilled.]

(4) If on an application for a PSV operator's licence the traffic [commissioner] [determines] that the relevant requirements mentioned in subsection (1) above and the further requirements mentioned in subsection (3) above are satisfied [he] shall, subject to [section 16] of this Act, grant the licence in accordance with the application.

[(5) In any case where the traffic commissioner grants an application for a PSV operator's licence, any undertakings taken into account by him under subsection (3A) above that he considers to be material to the granting of the application shall be recorded in the licence issued to the applicant.]
___________________

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
Tulsablue wrote:
If you wanted to treat your wife to something special for birthday etc and booked a limo, would the two of you hand over money each or would you pay for it in one go.

But the law is the law, and the 2000 act amendment is the 2000 act amendment.

Perhaps we should go back and remember why that amendment happened. :-k

Prior to 2000 a few naughty operators operating out of some regional airports worked out they could get rid of all this taxi/PH lark for their airport 'taxi' services, and licensed as PSV.

They acted and served the public in the same way as taxi/PH, by having a one price per vehicle policy, and it was 100% legal.

Ministers and the gov very quickly realised that this would lead to chaos, and decided that if a small PSV wanted to act like a taxi/PH then they had best license as a taxi/PH.

Hence the amendment. :D

Which brings me back to your point, which is a very reasonable one IMO, the law has outlawed fixed prices for small PSVs, and that includes the small PSVs that happen to be about 40ft long. :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Here's another tuc tuc operation, in Plymouth.

STEPHEN PAUL INGLEBY T/A PLYMOUTH TUK TUK TOURS, 9 ,
BEATTY CLOSE, DERRIFORD , PLYMOUTH PL6 6LJ
PH1065884/2
From: Plymouth
To: Plymouth
Via:
Name or No: Plymouth Tuc Tuc Tours
Service Type: Flexible Registration
Effective Date: 19-Apr-2007
Other Details: Every day 1000 - 1930
_____________

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
The application must be for a standard license but if the vehicles only seat six passengers then I'm assuming that can't be right, I also assume the same applies to a restricted license?

I think he gets his ops license first, and then puts on what he likes as far as it has got approval by the DVLA i.e. a tax disc.

The act says;

(1) .. in this Act “public service vehicles means a motor vehicle .. which –
(a) being a vehicle adapted to carry more than eight passengers, is used for carrying passengers for hire or reward; or
(b) being a vehicle not so adapted, is used for carrying passengers for hire or reward at separate fares in the course of a business of carrying passengers


Which basically means that anyone can run a fleet of 100% tuk tuks or even 100% Skodas as PSV.

The saving grace is the seperate fares issue, and when VOSA actually get around to enforcing the law of the land, it might cause a problem or two for the limo mob. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Quote:
Which basically means that anyone can run a fleet of 100% tuk tuks or even 100% Skodas as PSV.


So what insurance would you need for any of the above hire and reward or private :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 589 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group