Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 9:22 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Jay wrote:
Yes Trigger, I know I am a Winge-bag.But I've just turned 40, so its allowed now, right? Thing is though mate, when I first started,there was no age restriction. Just one of the many new regulations our council have thrown at us. Like we were one of,if not THE FIRST to HAVE to do the B tech. Also, now having to have 2 vehicle tests a year even if your vehicle is brand new.We also use to be able to drive both PH and HC if we had a HC licence.Now, even though I have a HC licence,when I renew, I have to pay for HC and PH. I'm just fed up with having to take all these new regulations from 7 councillors who dont have a clue about the taxi trade. And, with every new HC inspector, comes a new broom, a new ego and new "ideas". Any way Trigger, whinge over for now mate,but thanks for taking the time to read my rantings.


Who is your LA Jay :?: :?: seems a bit illogical having to get both hc and pH licences, I dont think there are many that do that, normally if you have hc then your covered for both.
I hope JD or TDO will let us know, I personally think the council is being unreasonable
Im sure there is something in the rules that states your covered for both


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 4:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
Im sure there is something in the rules that states your covered for both

In Scotland that is the position, but down here many councils have joint taxi/PH licenses, but most have separate ones.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 4:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Sussex wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
Im sure there is something in the rules that states your covered for both

In Scotland that is the position, but down here many councils have joint taxi/PH licenses, but most have separate ones.


Its a bloody con job if you ask me Sussex a HC should cover both no matter who issues it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:12 am
Posts: 590
Location: North Of The Tyne
In newcastle there is no combined badge eithier,so to drive a ph plated car a hack licenced driver would have to pay another 60 quid for the ph badge.

_________________
www.youtube.com/watch?v=z07K29Fc15U


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
TBH that's the problem with the trade, not only do most not know the rules when they start, only a few know them when they have finished. :roll:


Very true, a very high percentage of drivers start and end their Taxi career knowing absolutely nothing about the rules. All credit to those who are willing to make the effort to learn as they go along but I think an increasing number of councils are now introducing knowledge tests that do include such things as limited bylaw questions.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
skippy41 wrote:
I hope JD or TDO will let us know, I personally think the council is being unreasonable
Im sure there is something in the rules that states your covered for both


There is no logical reason why a hackney carriage drivers badge shouldn't include Private hire. We have discussed the policy before and the only reason in my opinion why councils don't combine the two is because of additional revenue.

In my opinion under current legislation anyone who desires just a private hire badge should be allowed one and a hackney carriage badge should combine both.

However the Taxi owners association the NTA who also like to think they represent the majority of cab drivers are of the opinion that councils know best, so it is no wonder that there has never been a concerted effort to get this cash cow removed.

It is patently obvious to me that councils who have such a policy certainly know whats best for them in terms of revenue, which in this particular case as we probably agree to a man, is contrary to the best interest of cab drivers.

If anyone cares to support councils who don't combine both badges then I'm sure we would all be interested to hear your views.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:51 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Bournemouth
My LA, Skippy, is Bournemouth. This separation of the two licences came about when our friendly local constabulary, accompanied by officers from the Town Hall,were out one evening.Obviously, concerned for our well being,they took the time to randomly flag in some passing PH and HC vehicles to make sure there was nothing nasty going on with the tyres etc, so none of us would hurt ourselves while going about our business.They are very thoughtful like that.One PH car they kindly checked, they noticed that the driver was not wearing his seat belt.The driver,fresh from completing his B Tech course so with a mind full of rules and regulations said, "As a licenced HC driver I dont have to wear one." To which the officer replied, "If you are a licenced HC driver, what are you doing driving a PH ?" The Town Hall officers observed all this, and quickly afterwards decided that we should all have two separate licences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Jay wrote:
My LA, Skippy, is Bournemouth. This separation of the two licences came about when our friendly local constabulary, accompanied by officers from the Town Hall,were out one evening.Obviously, concerned for our well being,they took the time to randomly flag in some passing PH and HC vehicles to make sure there was nothing nasty going on with the tyres etc, so none of us would hurt ourselves while going about our business.They are very thoughtful like that.One PH car they kindly checked, they noticed that the driver was not wearing his seat belt.The driver,fresh from completing his B Tech course so with a mind full of rules and regulations said, "As a licenced HC driver I dont have to wear one." To which the officer replied, "If you are a licenced HC driver, what are you doing driving a PH ?" The Town Hall officers observed all this, and quickly afterwards decided that we should all have two separate licences.



"As a licenced HC driver I dont have to wear one"??????? (seatbelt)

Since when?

Did he pass his B Tech? :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:51 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Bournemouth
A quote from TRANSPORTING PASSENGERS BY TAXI AND PRIVATE HIRE Unit 4 page 11; "Taxi drivers are exempt from wearing seat belts when carrying passengers and plying for hire within their own district. Private hire drivers are exempt from wearing seat belts only when carrying passengers."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
JD wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
I hope JD or TDO will let us know, I personally think the council is being unreasonable
Im sure there is something in the rules that states your covered for both


There is no logical reason why a hackney carriage drivers badge shouldn't include Private hire. We have discussed the policy before and the only reason in my opinion why councils don't combine the two is because of additional revenue.

In my opinion under current legislation anyone who desires just a private hire badge should be allowed one and a hackney carriage badge should combine both.

However the Taxi owners association the NTA who also like to think they represent the majority of cab drivers are of the opinion that councils know best, so it is no wonder that there has never been a concerted effort to get this cash cow removed.

It is patently obvious to me that councils who have such a policy certainly know whats best for them in terms of revenue, which in this particular case as we probably agree to a man, is contrary to the best interest of cab drivers.

If anyone cares to support councils who don't combine both badges then I'm sure we would all be interested to hear your views.

Regards

JD


Jd Could this come under best practice regulations?? as its seems that councils that charge for both are profiteering and could be challenged in court as being unreasonable and unnecessary
I think a nicely worded letter to the councils that charge for both is on the cards JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
This is one area that makes private hire not suitable for stretched limousines or for that matter most executive hire. If you have to get a combined Hackney/private hire drivers badge, you will have to pass the "local" knowlege test even though you may never actually work in your "local" area. The vast majority of my work never even goes through my "local" area.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Jay wrote:
A quote from TRANSPORTING PASSENGERS BY TAXI AND PRIVATE HIRE Unit 4 page 11; "Taxi drivers are exempt from wearing seat belts when carrying passengers and plying for hire within their own district. Private hire drivers are exempt from wearing seat belts only when carrying passengers."


Well quite.

So Jay, when a dual badged driver is driving a PH, is he a Hack driver or a PH driver? In your opinion.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
I think Jay fully understands the difference. It was the new driver that he was quoting who was having the problem.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
jimbo wrote:
So Jay, when a dual badged driver is driving a PH, is he a Hack driver or a PH driver? In your opinion.


I think the regulations refer to the vehicle rather than the driver, so the question is academic in this context?

However, since the driver of a PH vehicle can't do the primary thing that distinguises a taxi from a PH vehicle (ie ply for hire) then I would class the driver of a PH vehicle with a dual badge as a PH driver.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
TDO wrote:
jimbo wrote:
So Jay, when a dual badged driver is driving a PH, is he a Hack driver or a PH driver? In your opinion.


I think the regulations refer to the vehicle rather than the driver, so the question is academic in this context?

However, since the driver of a PH vehicle can't do the primary thing that distinguises a taxi from a PH vehicle (ie ply for hire) then I would class the driver of a PH vehicle with a dual badge as a PH driver.


Yes, I knew that, I just wondered what Jay's view was.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 516 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group