Taxi Driver Online

Indeed they can reject an application from an unfit person. If they consider any applicant to be such they would have been notified as soon as an objection was lodged by police or whoever.

_________________

http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/

The surveys are a crock.

The government use reports carried out by “experts” to make their decisions look plausible. These “Experts” are given a brief of what the Government wants, in this case Local Government. They claim the reports to be “independent” and they are. Only insofar as they are not direct employees of the council but sub-contracted in to do the job – whoever pays the fiddler calls the tune.

The information to approve the policy is bought and paid for. It has absolutely zero to do with the truth. If they do happen to print the truth it’s more of an accident than deliberate intent.

If you want proof PM me.

Btw, we went to War on the kind of proof I am talking about here.

It's not about demand and it never was.

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

If you want proof PM me.

Come on now Garry, it's not like you to be so backwards in coming forwards with wild allegations - just put the "proof" you have on here , or even better on you own website

_________________
Keyboards and Cretins : Facts - not opinions - are the only truths

Damascus Moments - easy excuses for a sociopath

TDO the website of double standards and changing identities

The proof is the council doing henners to keep scrutiny of its surveys out of the court system.

That's why we win.

I already know the SUD surveys are a feed of sh*t.
I was pointing out that they are the only legal means to deny the licences. Once the SUDs are proven to be crap, the council have nothing else left except to grant the applications. They have no other legal means to prevent this.



Quite right, it's about a council acting illegally and trying to find a legal means to justify its actions

_________________

http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/

No, it's about certain reading material numpties like you will never get access to at least not through me. I won't put it on here because I don't like people knowing what I read and for a very good reason.

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

Bang on

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

Would that reason be because it's not true, just a load of "sex-ed up" nonsense created by you.

Or is it so untrue it's actually so libelous, that even someone like you isn't that stupid as to put your name to it

_________________
Keyboards and Cretins : Facts - not opinions - are the only truths

Damascus Moments - easy excuses for a sociopath

TDO the website of double standards and changing identities

I'll tell you what the reading material is TC.

It's the Dandy.

However I feel happy telling you this because I know that it's a step too high in your reading age for you to get to grips with it.

So our knowledge base is safe.

How's the Beano coming along?

BTW

How do you manage to hold the Beano in one hand in the bath, without getting it wet, while the other five sisters are helping you to become blind?

How does this last post of yours sit with your view stated previously in this very thread and I quote "Erudite, reasoned and logical argument, coupled with accurate reporting and considered statement of the position versus TC's smiley strewn illiterate personal rants, notably devoid of any argument whatsoever, with no evident understanding of the issues and reeking of personal vested interests with no thought for other drivers nor the public we serve."
Your recent posts are hardly reasoned or logical and are definitely not erudite. Once again your megalomania is exposed. Knowing a few long words may impress some, but in your case you keep falling back into the abyss of ignorance where you truly belong.
When you really are capable of erudite, reasoned and logical argument then you just may find some erudite listeners. Until then stick with the likes of your boyfriend Skull, he's about your level.

The art of effective communication is to be able to communicate as equals. This is highlighted by the concept of transactional analysis.

Therefore parent may ably communicate with parent, adult with adult and child with child. Difficulties ensue when the parent level tries to communicate as such with adults or children. There tends to be a matter of parental superiority which affects communication quality. That's why it is advisable for adults to communicate on an adult to adult basis. And for adults when dealing with children to understand the child level they are communicating with and use that knowledge to compensate accordingly.

However, in the case of TC, and yourself John T, it is difficult to communicate on an adult level with you both. The temptation therefore exists to communicate on a parent to child basis.

Now, although I recognise that this is a poor communication scenario, doomed to failure because the child is unable to grasp even the basics of what a parent or adult may say to it, in both your cases I don't care enough about you to be bothered to communicate reasonably with you. It would be a futile waste of time.

The communication level between the campaigners and you is therefore the manifest indication of the contempt we have for you.

Does that explain it for you?



BTW I note from your post that you still seem to be confusing us with someone who cares.