Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 10:19 am

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 4 of 16
  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
Did I suggest such a thing? Just concentrate on what I say and respond appropriately, such childish comments do not enhance any remnants of credibility you might retain?

JD


Jeez JD, you really are up your own backside arent you.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:

Since when has the moral judgment been placed on your shoulders to decide who gets what? Shouldn't your sole concern be for the best interests of hackney carriage drivers? Oh I forgot you don't represent hackney carriage drivers?

Have you explained to your membership that because you are so concerned that councillors will not be able to vet those persons who run hackney carriage radio circuits that you are going to make it an offence for every hackney carriage driver in the country who takes private bookings from home or anywhere else for that matter? Oh! I forgot to mention the undefined contradictory amendment to section 80. Whoever dreamed that up deserves a medal.

It might be wise if you concentrated on the well being of the hackney carriage trade and leave the licensing of private hire vehicles, drivers and operators to those who are vested with that task.

JD


Possibly since the day you decided the moral judgement was on your shoulders.....from memory you represent......1 person?

I dont represent anyone I'm afraid...you really should keep up to date with these things.

Anyway....I thought this was the JD wishes to apologise to Wayne Casey thread.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:

Since when has the moral judgment been placed on your shoulders to decide who gets what? Shouldn't your sole concern be for the best interests of hackney carriage drivers? Oh I forgot you don't represent hackney carriage drivers?

Have you explained to your membership that because you are so concerned that councillors will not be able to vet those persons who run hackney carriage radio circuits that you are going to make it an offence for every hackney carriage driver in the country who takes private bookings from home or anywhere else for that matter? Oh! I forgot to mention the undefined contradictory amendment to section 80. Whoever dreamed that up deserves a medal.

It might be wise if you concentrated on the well being of the hackney carriage trade and leave the licensing of private hire vehicles, drivers and operators to those who are vested with that task.

JD


Possibly since the day you decided the moral judgement was on your shoulders.....from memory you represent......1 person?

I dont represent anyone I'm afraid...you really should keep up to date with these things.

Anyway....I thought this was the JD wishes to apologise to Wayne Casey thread.

CC



I dont represent anyone I'm afraid...you really should keep up to date with these things.
Quote:

Is this why you where black balled and asked to stand down from the association due the the station rank fiasco :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:

Since when has the moral judgment been placed on your shoulders to decide who gets what? Shouldn't your sole concern be for the best interests of hackney carriage drivers? Oh I forgot you don't represent hackney carriage drivers?

Have you explained to your membership that because you are so concerned that councillors will not be able to vet those persons who run hackney carriage radio circuits that you are going to make it an offence for every hackney carriage driver in the country who takes private bookings from home or anywhere else for that matter? Oh! I forgot to mention the undefined contradictory amendment to section 80. Whoever dreamed that up deserves a medal.

It might be wise if you concentrated on the well being of the hackney carriage trade and leave the licensing of private hire vehicles, drivers and operators to those who are vested with that task.

JD


Possibly since the day you decided the moral judgement was on your shoulders.....from memory you represent......1 person?

I dont represent anyone I'm afraid...you really should keep up to date with these things.

Anyway....I thought this was the JD wishes to apologise to Wayne Casey thread.

CC



I dont represent anyone I'm afraid...you really should keep up to date with these things.
Quote:

Is this why you where black balled and asked to stand down from the association due the the station rank fiasco :lol: :lol: :lol:


No I stood down in September 06 before the Carlisle Conference, of my own accord.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Code:
I would definitely be peeved off if these amendments ever saw the light of day and so would the majority of the hackney carriage trade but I'm going to do everything within my power to see that they don't see the light of day and you may quote me on that.
So I take it you're against.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Quote:
No I stood down in September 06 before the Carlisle Conference, of my own accord.


Ran before you was pushed more than likely, :lol: :lol: its a wonder the council have not called you in for a conference and given you a good tongue lashing for bringing them into disrepute, mind you they where just as bad
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
Quote:
No I stood down in September 06 before the Carlisle Conference, of my own accord.


Ran before you was pushed more than likely, :lol: :lol: its a wonder the council have not called you in for a conference and given you a good tongue lashing for bringing them into disrepute, mind you they where just as bad


skippy dont talk about things you have been mislead on / know f*ck all about :roll:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:

Since when has the moral judgment been placed on your shoulders to decide who gets what? Shouldn't your sole concern be for the best interests of hackney carriage drivers? Oh I forgot you don't represent hackney carriage drivers?

Have you explained to your membership that because you are so concerned that councillors will not be able to vet those persons who run hackney carriage radio circuits that you are going to make it an offence for every hackney carriage driver in the country who takes private bookings from home or anywhere else for that matter? Oh! I forgot to mention the undefined contradictory amendment to section 80. Whoever dreamed that up deserves a medal.

It might be wise if you concentrated on the well being of the hackney carriage trade and leave the licensing of private hire vehicles, drivers and operators to those who are vested with that task.

JD


Possibly since the day you decided the moral judgement was on your shoulders.....from memory you represent......1 person?

I dont represent anyone I'm afraid...you really should keep up to date with these things.

Anyway....I thought this was the JD wishes to apologise to Wayne Casey thread.

CC


CC I think you owe JD an apology as he has seen right though you all along, and he has been right from the start
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
Anyway....I thought this was the JD wishes to apologise to Wayne Casey thread.


lol my apology was directed at you and the NTA for my INFERENCE that you may have been the architect or joint architect of these amendments?

I am not yet convinced that you and the NTA played no part in suggesting to NALEO the changes you wanted in order to satisfy your warped sense of priorities.

My apology was two fold and I'm not surprised you took the bait, obviously we can't force you to tell us why we hackney carriage drivers need an upstart like you to tell us how we should operate?

I thought it might be entertaining for you to answer some questions from the hackney carriage trade as to why you want to stuff them again, the same way you did in Carlisle?

When my inquiries are complete I'll let everyone know how these proposals came about and who backs them and who instigated them. It wouldn't surprise me to find your name and that of region 2 of the NTA at the top of the pile? lol.

I wouldn't go denying anything that might come back and bite you on the azz because looking at your past comments on this issue your grave is half dug?

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
captain cab wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
Quote:
No I stood down in September 06 before the Carlisle Conference, of my own accord.


Ran before you was pushed more than likely, :lol: :lol: its a wonder the council have not called you in for a conference and given you a good tongue lashing for bringing them into disrepute, mind you they where just as bad


skippy dont talk about things you have been mislead on / know f*ck all about :roll:

CC


What have I been misled on CC you misled the council into believing the station rank should only be used for wav's, and when the push came yours and the councils arses sounded like a brass band warming up :lol: :lol:
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
JD wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Anyway....I thought this was the JD wishes to apologise to Wayne Casey thread.


lol my apology was directed at you and the NTA for my INFERENCE that you may have been the architect or joint architect of these amendments?

I am not yet convinced that you and the NTA played no part in suggesting to NALEO the changes you wanted in order to satisfy your warped sense of priorities.

My apology was two fold and I'm not surprised you took the bait, obviously we can't force you to tell us why we hackney carriage drivers need an upstart like you to tell us how we should operate?

I thought it might be entertaining for you to answer some questions from the hackney carriage trade as to why you want to stuff them again, the same way you did in Carlisle?

When my inquiries are complete I'll let everyone know how these proposals came about and who backs them and who instigated them. It wouldn't surprise me to find your name and that of region 2 of the NTA at the top of the pile? lol.

I wouldn't go denying anything that might come back and bite you on the azz because looking at your past comments on this issue your grave is half dug?

JD


Yes CC, JD will get the info and you will be fecked again, anyway whats with this masons malarkey or the knock 3 times club as is widely known, just have the balls to spill the beans and lets debate these oh so secret ( NOT) docs
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Skippy.. exactly how far can you really get your head up your ar$e.. just curious......

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
MR T wrote:
Skippy.. exactly how far can you really get your head up your ar$e.. just curious......


have I mentioned your name MR T no, but to answer you question truthfully not as far as you can, :wink: :wink: or CC for that matter :wink: :wink:
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Hello, hello out there !!!!!

Please just for me, even if only on this thread, can we debate this important issue? [-o<

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Sussex wrote:
Hello, hello out there !!!!!

Please just for me, even if only on this thread, can we debate this
important issue? [-o<


OK Sussex I nominate you as vice chair :wink: :wink:
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 4 of 16
  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 634 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group