Skull wrote:
Oh and btw, I got a witness citation delivered a few weeks ago without any trouble over a different matter. It makes you wonder how the Sheriff Officers couldn't find my address a second time around.

Very curious when you consider that your address is on your recently renewed taxi licence.
They didn't want to find you Skull. The plan was for the notice to be served on me, at the last legally possible moment, for me to panic, to shecht myself and put my head in the sand while the legal eagles went before the bench to shaft me.
Well, they got that wrong didn't they? Methinks they underestimated their foe. They should have realised by now that when I'm attacked I invariably attack as the first and usually best form of defence. It worked here.
As for you Skull, they most certainly didn't want you there. They were hoping the judge would grant the interdict against you
in absentia, claiming they had made reasonable attempts to find you.
However, when your address is publicly available, and they would reasonably know this, they have mislead the Court. I'd reckon that the bench will take a dim view of this.
Indeed, is there a case for a charge of malpractice here by the legal team? Doesn't it appear to go way beyond what could be deemed reasonable, rather it being a deliberate attempt to inflict an Interdict against an individual unopposed? Wouldn't that be a clear breach of Human Rights? Is the system designed to allow "gagging orders" to be imposed willy nilly? What kind of message would that send to a supposedly free and democratic society?
No, our pursuers appear to be playing fast and loose with the system, racking up ever more costs in the process, making mistakes, and paying even more of others' cash for them. The bill just keeps climbing.
Perhaps this is acceptable to those who may be levied to pay for this?
BTW As things stand we, don't actually know whether the Interdicts have been imposed. I haven't had any formal legal confirmation of this, from the Court or the Lawyers, and the Skull hasn't even been notified of any intent to seek one against him.
