Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:37 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
Andy wrote:
Just four Dusty.


Glutton for punishment. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
I wouldn't mind, but when the fourth one left me, she didn't take the kids, yet she still got to keep the house! There is no justice!

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 1:36 pm 
No wonder you said you couldn't afford Mercs Andy.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
:?

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:59 pm 
My council doesnt do the fares this way. Is it used in many areas?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 11:03 pm 
Pete wrote:
My council doesnt do the fares this way. Is it used in many areas?


how does your council do it?

ours you just apply and these days rarely refuse

Wharfie


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
I suspect Pete's council reviews the fares like most.

The drivers and unions ask for A, the council 6 months later say C, then another 6 months later they agree on B.

But by then, another review is due. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
The Council does not set fares at all in our district. It is for the operators to charge what they like. It works.

It works because this is a rural area and one needs to rely on developing a customer base of regulars. Would it work in a big city like London, for example?

I think not. But, having said that, it might if everyone were forced to display their fares on the door to a pre-set pattern that is understandable. Eg> £50 per mile or pro-rata.

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
Andy wrote:
The Council does not set fares at all in our district. It is for the operators to charge what they like. It works.


Now that could be viewed as a sensible system, if worked by reasonable people.

However, I wonder how OFT will view that?

In districts where councils set fares, you could have a good defense of 'not me guv', against a cartel inquiry. I'm not so sure in your manor.

Perhaps that's what holding up the report. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
Your qualification of "reasonable people" is where the problem lies. Sadly, the world is only partially populated by reasonable people. For the rest, we need definitive and in some ways prescriptive, qualitative control, which, in an area heavily frequented by "non-locals" prone to be "ripped off" by the unreasonable ones, may be better served by the setting of some statutory maximum charges.

God, I wish I knew all the answers. All I can seem to do is raise more questions.

Like Dusty, I live in hope that the OFT will provide some reason, but, like yourself I think, I have absolutely no conviction that they will. I am just another cynic I'm afraid.

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
I'm hopeful enough about the OFT and/or CC Andy, it's the politicians that worry me - at the end of the day, the competition authorities can't do much without Parliament.

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Andy wrote:
The Council does not set fares at all in our district. It is for the operators to charge what they like. It works.

It works because this is a rural area and one needs to rely on developing a customer base of regulars. Would it work in a big city like London, for example?

I think not. But, having said that, it might if everyone were forced to display their fares on the door to a pre-set pattern that is understandable. Eg> £50 per mile or pro-rata.


Perhaps Andy, but £50 per mile is a bit extortionate, innit?? :D

It could work on longer journeys, but not on short ones, since it would be like comparing half a dozen tariff cards on the rank, which would be difficult, even assuming you knew where how far you were going.

In any case, people would still tend to just go to the first taxi on the rank anyway, and as far as street hails are concerned they couldn't compare anyway, and would tend to take the first cab that came along.

As for maximum prices, these are no use if they are way above the 'market rate' since, those who know the score will pay less than those who don't know that discounting is rife, and will just pay the metered price.

It's a bit like that in my manor - the LA sets an out-of-area fare (possibly illegally), and on mega-long journeys a cab can be secured for up to half the metered fare.

Of course this is good for those in the trade who manage to secure fares at these rates, but I doubt if the OFT would like that kind of thing from the consumer angle.

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
Dammit, is there no solution to anything! :? If we go single-tier, and the prices are pre-set by Government of some form, then we remove peoples choice of whether to hire a saloon, a black cab or a Mercedes E-class. As they cannot all be reasonably operated at the same rate.

So how should this one be sorted?

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Good point Andy, for one thing there would still have to be a PH sector operating, but this would be chauffeur stuff and suchlike, not just cabs that don't have access to the street market.

I think for a one-tier trade you would have to specify a reasonable standard for cars and drivers, and a reasonable fare structure to match.

This might not leave much scope for a superior service, but the public would gain from a more uniform service for a uniform price.

As for PBs and WAVs, these could conceviably be part of a one-tier structure, on the basis of the kind of incentives we discussed earlier.

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:56 pm 
So what kind of incentives do you believe the government, be it local or national, offer.

How would such things be financed and administered.

Any sort of P/H provision is two tier mate, as nothing could stop me using a Ford Sierra as a chaffuer car working for a pound a mile and therefore licenses to operate would need to be issued. Is that not contained within the 76 act.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 564 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group