Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:30 pm

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 4
  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
skippy41 wrote:
JD wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
JD, how can we find out the outcome quickly Is there a court link to the case??


It will be a couple of weeks before they give their ruling and it will be on the scottish courts website.

Regards

JD


So they do not make the decision tomorrow and we have to wait that bit longer :shock:


In this particular case yes.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:

So they do not make the decision tomorrow and we have to wait that bit longer :shock:

These issues need to be studied and digested by the judges, the trade needs a clear-cut judgement, not the usual faffing about. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
echo15
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:40 pm
Posts: 1046
Why is the date last year? :?

_________________
Life? Don't talk to me about life!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjm2eslm6hI
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
echo15 wrote:
Why is the date last year? :?


JD's watch has stopped? :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Well spotted that man. lol

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
echo15 wrote:
Why is the date last year? :?

Benjamin Button is the judge. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
I heard the lady concerned (with this judgement) on the radio today, and although it has diddly squat to do with the Sneddon case, it should give hope to all out there when taking on the big (bad) guys.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/46.html

And I've voted Lord Justice Jacob judge of the year 2009 just for his first paragraph. =D> =D> =D> =D>

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
This case must have been pulled out of the list for this week because I can't see it listed. I'll get an update tomorrow.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
This case has been put back until the 19th March.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
gusmac
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
JD wrote:
This case has been put back until the 19th March.

Regards

JD


Any idea why?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
gusmac wrote:


Any idea why?


Sorry Gus I haven't a clue.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Thursday 19th March

Continued Summar Roll (1 Day)

XA173/07 Appeal in the Summary Application under the

Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, Section 4 - in the cause -

Thomas Sneddon against Renfrewshire Council

Allan McDougall - Simpson & Marwick

Still on course so it would appear.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
If it goes MR Sneddons way, does that mean owners all over Scotland will have the freedom of choice of vehicles and that councils cannot impose an all WaV condition

Hopefully yes, that will only leave the Liverpool case to sort out the rest of the UK's WAV problem
Top
 Profile  
 
gusmac
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
If it goes MR Sneddons way, does that mean owners all over Scotland will have the freedom of choice of vehicles and that councils cannot impose an all WaV condition

Hopefully yes, that will only leave the Liverpool case to sort out the rest of the UK's WAV problem


Yes, if Renfrewshire's appeal is denied, that will be the situation until such time as the Scottish Exec. step in with regulations on the WAV issue.
Any victory could still be short lived.

English law is different on this since councils do have the power to impose such conditions. Whether a court will deem them reasonable is another matter.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
skippy41
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
gusmac wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
If it goes MR Sneddons way, does that mean owners all over Scotland will have the freedom of choice of vehicles and that councils cannot impose an all WaV condition

Hopefully yes, that will only leave the Liverpool case to sort out the rest of the UK's WAV problem


Yes, if Renfrewshire's appeal is denied, that will be the situation until such time as the Scottish Exec. step in with regulations on the WAV issue.
Any victory could still be short lived.

English law is different on this since councils do have the power to impose such conditions. Whether a court will deem them reasonable is another matter.


Have you put the taxi centre on standby Guss :wink:
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 4
  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1519 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group