Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Oct 06, 2025 3:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:08 pm
Posts: 244
Odd that we can't agree on this, I will be asking my local MP to look into this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Plymouth
Midlander wrote:
Yes they are. There's a PH firm round here who charge what they want, when the Council have been told about this thye say, they dont come under the Councils pricing policy.

In a nutshell, that is why my previous on this was YES.

The PH gang can always charge what they like.

They can charge £1.00 one minute and £3.00 the next.

They can fit a meter and then state that they charge what the meter says and 50% if they like.

On pricing in PH, there ain't any rules.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56477
Location: 1066 Country
thelodger wrote:
Odd that we can't agree on this, I will be asking my local MP to look into this.

I think we all agree it's wrong, but I'm still not 100% sure quoting a price for a WAV, via a PH booking, is illegal if it's more than a price for a saloon.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Sussex wrote:
Say someone had a breathing problem and needed an estate car to keep their oxygen tank in, would it be wrong to quote them the extra that some firms charge for an estate car request?


Good question.

But again the HC scenario is perhaps instructive - someone might be charged extra for an estate car on the rank for abnormal luggage, a charge which a saloon wouldn't attract - but if a normal person got into the estate on the rank with no luggage then they would be charged the same as if it was a saloon.

Thus if the LA allowed an extra charge for abnormal loads would the estate HC be able to charge this from the rank if someone appeared with their oxygen tank?

Presumably not.

Thus in the PH scenario perhaps it would depend if the firm used the WAV or estate for smaller groups or those without luggagae and just charge them the same for a saloon. Thus they would only be charged the premium rate for the WAV or estate if they actually requested it.

In such circumstances it may be difficult to justify charging extra regarding a disablement.

But to be honest I don't really know, and I doubt the authorities do either, but I'm sure there'll be guidance on the issue somewhere, but I'm not sufficiently interested to look for it. :-|

Didn't the relevant minister make a statement on it not that long ago?

But I doubt if it answers the question you pose anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
I though that Private Hire Operators;

1. Quote a price for a job.
2. Do not have to abide by any licensing authority tariff.
3. Do not have to accept any job and can decline service.
4. Are not bound by the WAV legislation in The Equality Act 2010.


I think the provision in question is in the DDA and applies to all service providers - such as the pub or shop making 'reasonable adjustments' to accomodate the disabled, as they're required to do - thus PH firms would come under this as well. They shouldn't charge extra to cater for a disablement.

Or to put it another way, the disabled shouldn't incur extra charges because of their disablement that an able bodied person wouldn't incur.

Thus to that extent I think that the fact that PH fares are (usually) unregulated by the LA is a bit of a red herring as regards the original question.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Dusty Bin wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
I though that Private Hire Operators;

1. Quote a price for a job.
2. Do not have to abide by any licensing authority tariff.
3. Do not have to accept any job and can decline service.
4. Are not bound by the WAV legislation in The Equality Act 2010.

I think the provision in question is in the DDA and applies to all service providers - such as the pub or shop making 'reasonable adjustments' to accomodate the disabled, as they're required to do - thus PH firms would come under this as well. They shouldn't charge extra to cater for a disablement.

Or to put it another way, the disabled shouldn't incur extra charges because of their disablement that an able bodied person wouldn't incur.

Thus to that extent I think that the fact that PH fares are (usually) unregulated by the LA is a bit of a red herring as regards the original question.

I was just stating how Private Hire Operators generally work.

I was fishing, but not for red herrings.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:33 pm
Posts: 4
i run a fleet of WAV, Minibus's, estates & Saloon cars...

We charge extra for WAV and our clients are more than happy to pay the extra charge. A WAV cost so much more than a ordinary Minibus or a saloon car. it needs to be specially converted & you pay for ramps and belts. The day we get stopped charging extra is the day i will have over 15 WAV for sale.

in our council Hackney Carriages do not charge extra for wheelchairs but funnly enough clients always complain that Hackney Carriages are not to pleased to pick up Wheelchair passengers (also refusing service due to not having necassary equipment) ..

my question is can a PH Firm afford to provide a service for Wheelchair passengers without any extra charge?

and if the answer is NO, PH will stop providing WAV...so who is loosing out? sad but true


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:37 pm
Posts: 187
Location: brighton and hove
Quote:
are PH companies allowed to do this.


Yes they can charge whatever they want.

As here in my area the councils insists of anything carrying over 4 passengers, must be a wav.
So there’s more cost occurs, ie car tax like 445.00 per yr and fuel, tyres etc

Now if a wheel chair person phone me up and ask a trip to the airport but has to stay in the chair, the price is the same as if a 5 0r 8 passenger book that vehicle

Against a person book a saloon car


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56477
Location: 1066 Country
kirklees Taxi Propiertor wrote:
my question is can a PH Firm afford to provide a service for Wheelchair passengers without any extra charge?

If the firm is of a reasonable size then I think they can quote the same.

Will your firm go under if you don't? I very much doubt it.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24351
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
so long as ALL wheelchair users (able bodied and disabled) are charged the same it must be legal

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24351
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
id say HC's are welcome to all the extra charges for providing a WAV, given that meter fares are usually higher than PH, but so are the costs of the vehicles and given that some never see a wheelchair job....

ive been an operator for several years, going back 20 years, never been asked for a WAV yet, ive run 8 seaters and to be honest, im not sure i needed one, im quite happy with £4K worth of mondeo

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Find it strange that you can discriminate against a wheelchair user,nobody charges extra here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:57 pm
Posts: 395
Location: South Coast
I don't drive a WAV but have had passengers who are "legally" diasabled for example blind or who have lost an arm.. They do not take any longer to do a job for, so no issues.

I have a regurlar elderly lady who uses a zimmer frame and does move very slowly but bless her she always tries to be outside ready for when I turn up.

Being non PC, I think what we are all saying is that loading a wheelchair user into and out of a WAV takes a good bit more time than an able bodied person just jumping in. We therefore have the issue time=money.

I hear that a lot of drivers just don't like doing or the idea of doing wheelchair work so avoid it.

I don't think anyone would be saying "We want to charge you more because you are disabled". What we are really saying is " I want to charge you more because it takes longer to load and unload you. I could lose other jobs as a consequence compared to a non wheelchair user getting in and out and I have to buy a more expensive vehicle that costs more to run so I can provide the service you want". I don't think that is discrimination.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56477
Location: 1066 Country
blackpool wrote:
Find it strange that you can discriminate against a wheelchair user,nobody charges extra here

If that view was the case, then Cab Direct wouldn't be able to charge more for an E7 than a Skoda.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Different altogether,can you charge more for a overweight person cause they take up more room,or elderly cause they take a while to get in ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group