Sussex wrote:
Say someone had a breathing problem and needed an estate car to keep their oxygen tank in, would it be wrong to quote them the extra that some firms charge for an estate car request?
Good question.
But again the HC scenario is perhaps instructive - someone might be charged extra for an estate car on the rank for abnormal luggage, a charge which a saloon wouldn't attract - but if a normal person got into the estate on the rank with no luggage then they would be charged the same as if it was a saloon.
Thus if the LA allowed an extra charge for abnormal loads would the estate HC be able to charge this from the rank if someone appeared with their oxygen tank?
Presumably not.
Thus in the PH scenario perhaps it would depend if the firm used the WAV or estate for smaller groups or those without luggagae and just charge them the same for a saloon. Thus they would only be charged the premium rate for the WAV or estate if they actually requested it.
In such circumstances it may be difficult to justify charging extra regarding a disablement.
But to be honest I don't really know, and I doubt the authorities do either, but I'm sure there'll be guidance on the issue somewhere, but I'm not sufficiently interested to look for it.
Didn't the relevant minister make a statement on it not that long ago?
But I doubt if it answers the question you pose anyway.