Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 4:26 pm

Board index » General » News

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 8
  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Guest
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:46 pm 
i think the days of tuk tuk limited getting much more nice headlines are slim.
people ride them once.
then realise how deadly they are. :sad:
it looks like even the anti taxi argus are even thinking twice about them.

one think the tuk tuk tw** hasnt condidered is that the local cab trade are clued up. and though they might be quiet loads is happening behind the sceens. :wink:

was a rumour mr tuk tuk wants to reduce his timetable to stop the traffic commissioner pulling the plug on him.
watch this space.
Top
  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Cgull wrote:
i think the days of tuk tuk limited getting much more nice headlines are slim.
people ride them once.
then realise how deadly they are. :sad:
it looks like even the anti taxi argus are even thinking twice about them.

one think the tuk tuk tw** hasnt condidered is that the local cab trade are clued up. and though they might be quiet loads is happening behind the sceens. :wink:

was a rumour mr tuk tuk wants to reduce his timetable to stop the traffic commissioner pulling the plug on him.
watch this space.


Good to see you guys in Brighton are keeping a watchful eye on their timetable, the operator can however apply to amend their timetable anytime they like. Even if the timetable is amended they still have to keep to it, this could leave them in the situation where they have to run vehicles at a loss?

The probable reason behind the amended timetable is lack of customers. If this state of affairs continues over a long period of time then the business won't be viable.

Operating such a service under PSV regulations leaves very little room for flexibility.

Regards

JD
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
Operating such a service under PSV regulations leaves very little room for flexibility.

From memory a bus time-table must be met at least 96% of the time Ribble-v-some bus mob 2001 I think.

They are allowed to be 5 mins late or 1 min early, but they must run.

If I was advising the B&H trade I would suggest they get an independant firm of traffic consultants to assess the tuk tuk time-table.

Might cost sheds loads of cash, but could well lead to the traffic commissioner putting a condition on their license that they can't operate.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
JD wrote:
Operating such a service under PSV regulations leaves very little room for flexibility.

From memory a bus time-table must be met at least 96% of the time Ribble-v-some bus mob 2001 I think.

They are allowed to be 5 mins late or 1 min early, but they must run.

If I was advising the B&H trade I would suggest they get an independant firm of traffic consultants to assess the tuk tuk time-table.

Might cost sheds loads of cash, but could well lead to the traffic commissioner putting a condition on their license that they can't operate.


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cg ... 1/267.html

As far as I'm aware you are right about the 5 minutes window and probably the one-minute window also. The Ribble case I've posted above.

Not keeping to a timetable is a serious breach of condition and I would think the Tuk Tuk business model is already feeling the strains of running its business on such limited flexibility.

Regards

JD
Top
 Profile  
 
Guest
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:47 pm 
i have heard that the tuk tuk p[eople are going to apply and have their timetable shortened.
but they keep telling everyone threr doing fab. :^o :^o
Top
  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Cgull wrote:
i have heard that the tuk tuk p[eople are going to apply and have their timetable shortened.
but they keep telling everyone threr doing fab. :^o :^o


How many routes do they have? If you could get hold of one of their timetables I'm sure it would make interesting reading on TDO.

Regards

JD
Top
 Profile  
 
Guest
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:32 pm 
http://www.tuctuc.co.uk/flashsite.html

on the timetable it says they can do the route in 20 mins.
at most times they couldnt do it in double that. :shock:
Top
  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Birmingham Evening Mail

August 11, 2006, Friday

HEADLINE: A big tut-tut from cabbies over safety of tuk-tuks

A NEW tuk-tuk service introduced in Brighton and due to be rolled out in cities across the UK could be putting passengers at risk. This is the view of Taxi-wise, the nationwide campaign for the safer use of taxis, following the recent launch of the service.

A dozen of the tiny vehicles, which are popular in India, are now available to carry passengers on the basis that they are good for the environment.

However, Taxiwise argues that the vehicles offer practically no protection in the event of an accident.
...........................................................
Top
 Profile  
 
tcabbie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 9:17 am
Posts: 598
Location: West Yorkshire
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hanoi_Tuktuk.jpg
Top
 Profile  
 
Guest
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:05 pm 
word on the streeyt is that the tuk tuk are going to an enquirey early Oct.
by all accounts the trade appointed a independant firm of consultants and they ripped to sreads the tuk tuk timetable.
but more importantly the traffic commissioner has also monitored the timetable and they have only met 40 odd % of it.
in other words the operator is in the poo big time. \:D/ \:D/ \:D/
Top
  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Cgull wrote:
word on the streeyt is that the tuk tuk are going to an enquirey early Oct.
by all accounts the trade appointed a independant firm of consultants and they ripped to sreads the tuk tuk timetable.
but more importantly the traffic commissioner has also monitored the timetable and they have only met 40 odd % of it.
in other words the operator is in the poo big time. \:D/ \:D/ \:D/


That will be a nice piece of advertising for Mr. Tuk Tuk.

Regards

JD
Top
 Profile  
 
Guest
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:00 am 
one down. few more to go. :D

http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.9 ... f_road.php
Top
  
 
Guest
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:18 pm 
Cgull wrote:
one down. few more to go. :D

spoke too soon.
hopefully the commissioner will them them all to tuk off. :D :D :D :D

Section 5

Section 5.1 Notice Of Public Inquiries To Be Held

A transcript of the taped proceedings of Public Inquiries (either in full
or in part) may be ordered from the Traffic Area Office Compliance Unit.
The cost of the transcript varies according to demand and size of content
and the Compliance Unit will be able to advise on the scale of charges when
an order is placed.

Appeals in connection with PSV Operator Licences must be lodged with the
Transport Tribunal, Procession House, 55 Ludgate Hill, London EC4M 7JW not
later than 28 days after the date of the letter conveying the Traffic
Commissioner’s (or Deputy Traffic Commissioner’s) decision. A copy of the
appeals booklet is available from the Traffic Area Office on request.
Appellants can alternatively obtain guidance on lodging appeals by visiting
the VOSA website at www.vosa.gov.uk

Public Inquiry (33231) to be held at Court Room(SEMTA), Ivy House, Ivy
Terrace, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 4QT, on 03 October 2006
commencing at 10:00(Previous Publication:(2102)

PK1047478 SN
TUC-TUC LIMITED
Director(s): DOMINIC PONNIAH.
42 CAMBRIDGE ST LONDON SW1V 4QH

PSV - S26 - Consideration of disciplinary action under Section 26 (The
Transport Act 1985) |
PSV - S155 - Consideration of action under Section 155 (The Transport
Act 2000)
PSV - S17 - Consideration of disciplinary action under Section 17 (The
Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981)
Top
  
 
GBC
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Yes, its heartning to see the B&H trade and companies have put aside any small differences to eliminate a major one, these things were deemed a nuisance before they even took to the streets, but the ivory tower always knows best? [-(

Lets hope if, and thats still a big 'if' they ever appear on the streets of the capital the trade organisations will will fight the common goal.

I'll stand united with brother Terry, Ollie and Rambo to block the A23 into London. :wink:
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Cgull wrote:

PK1047478 SN
TUC-TUC LIMITED
Director(s): DOMINIC PONNIAH.
42 CAMBRIDGE ST LONDON SW1V 4QH

PSV - S26 - Consideration of disciplinary action under Section 26 (The
Transport Act 1985) |
PSV - S155 - Consideration of action under Section 155 (The Transport
Act 2000)
PSV - S17 - Consideration of disciplinary action under Section 17 (The
Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981)[/b]


This has been on the cards, I believe the only reason these vehicles were introduced is because they thought they could get away with plying for hire as hackney carriages.

This is the first step in getting them to comply with the legislation they are licensed under. If they are found to have breached licensing conditions and they get a warning to their future conduct then a second breach of conditions could prove fatal.

Regards

JD
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 8
  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Board index » General » News

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 523 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group