GA wrote:
TDO wrote:
1 JD dumped Tony Mite, not the other way round.
Well we shall just have to take your word for that then Dusty ............ won't we.
Not really - if you look back at TM's posts on here then I'm sure you'll find plenty to substantiate my claim, and that's even without private correspondence.
Quote:
TDO wrote:
2 What is the inaccurate information in the lists that you're going on about, or is this the same figment of your imagination that we discussed at length on here a couple of years ago and at various other times?
Have you ever asked a taxi driver how much he's took .................. I suspect that the values of plates get an equally varied answer. But lets not allow facts to get in the way of a good story.
Of course plates vary in value, just like house prices etc. But you seem to use this fact to invalidate JD's list, for example if the list states they're worth £40k in Taxiville and one subsequently goes for £35k or £45k then you'll use this to invalidate the whole exercise. But anyone who knows the nature of the beast will know that the figures can never be 100% accurate, but on the other hand they aren't materially incorrect.
If someone says a barrel of oil is worth $80 and the next week it's worth $85 do you jump up and down and say that the first figure was incorrect?
I would hope not.
And we've been through all this before, but it wouldn't do to let reality get in the way of a good smear, would it?
Quote:
TDO wrote:
3 Yes, JD represents TDO, as do I and Alex, next you'll have a problem with a union official representing a union or whatever.
Representatives of unions or whatever are elected.
Representatives of unions or whatever are directed by their membership to carry forward the views of the majority of the membership, who are given opportunity to formulate the proposals and then declare their wishes through a vote.
Well I don't have a problem with that, but TDO isn't a representative organisation, so why are you trying to draw some sort of comparison?
Quote:
TDO wrote:
But the point is that your comparison of TDO with the NTA et al is fatuous because it's not a representative organisation.
So why have representatives, or people calling themselves representatives.
Because the word is used in a different context and has a different meaning.
If someone phoned you and said they were representing Taxi Talk magazine, would you conclude from that that they represented its readership or even people who wrote letters or even penned articles for it?
No, of course not.
Quote:
TDO wrote:
The NTA, GMB, T&G, local taxi associations are representative organisations, TDO isn't, and has never purported to be; is that clear enough.
And that's different to someone representing TDO.
But Dusty ........... when we apply the words as is understood by the local authority ............ a representative of a group (whether web-based or otherwise) indicates that they are representing the views of the membership of that group.
But it's not a group in that context, and anyone with any common sense will know that.
If I join a discussion forum on a newspaper, magazine or political party's website, for example, do I then say that they're representing me? No, of course not, everyone knows that you just join the forum so that you can contribute to it.
Suppose you could contribute to the forum without having to register, would that make you think differently? Probably, so to that extent the membership of the forum is just about having to register to be able to post, and it means nothing more than that.
And since you've run forums of your own in the past then you'll know that the 'member' terminology is the forum software's, not ours. Perhaps it might be clearer if a term like "registrant" was used, but it wouldn't change the substance of what's going on, and indeed I think the vast majority of people are aware of the substance.
Quote:
You don't, Alex doesn't, JD doesn't and thats because, as you very clearly point out, TDO IS NOT A REPRESENTATIVE GROUP.
Well if you agree that it isn't then what's the problem? The only person who seems to think that it's a representative group is you.
And why do you compare TDO to the unions and NTA if they're different beasts?
You describe the unions as democratic, but call TDO a dictatorship. Does that mean Taxi Talk or T a x i - T o d a y magazines are dictatorships, or when you ran your own forum was that a dictatorship as well?